lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 06/15] mfd: axp20x: Add support for AXP192
On Tue, 05 Jul 2022, Aidan MacDonald wrote:

>
> Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2022, Aidan MacDonald wrote:
> >
> >> The AXP192 PMIC is similar to the AXP202/AXP209, but with different
> >> regulators, additional GPIOs, and a different IRQ register layout.
> >>
> >> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c | 2 +
> >> drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 3 files changed, 238 insertions(+)
> >> [...]
> >> +static const struct regmap_irq_chip axp192_regmap_irq_chip = {
> >> + .name = "axp192_irq_chip",
> >> + .status_base = AXP192_IRQ1_STATE,
> >> + .ack_base = AXP192_IRQ1_STATE,
> >> + .unmask_base = AXP192_IRQ1_EN,
> >> + .init_ack_masked = true,
> >> + .irqs = axp192_regmap_irqs,
> >> + .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(axp192_regmap_irqs),
> >> + .num_regs = 5,
> >> + .get_irq_reg = axp192_get_irq_reg,
> >
> > Fix me:
> >
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x.c:634:35: error: initialization of 'unsigned int (*)(struct regmap_irq_chip_data *, unsigned int, int)' from incompatible pointer type 'int (*)(unsigned int, int)' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > 634 | .get_irq_reg = axp192_get_irq_reg,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x.c:634:35: note: (near initialization for 'axp192_regmap_irq_chip.get_irq_reg')
> >
>
> This doesn't need fixing. You are missing the prerequisite patches.
>
> -- snip --
> Changes in v4:
> * Drop regmap-irq patches and rebase on top of the regmap-irq
> refactoring series[1], which implements the same functionality.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220623211420.918875-1-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com/
> -- snip --

> Perhaps I wasn't clear enough that it was a dependency, sorry for
> any confusion.

Any idea why the regmap-irq patches weren't in -next?

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-05 16:39    [W:0.049 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site