lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 1/4] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom,msm8998-cpu-bwmon: add BWMON device
From


On 6/30/2022 4:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/06/2022 13:14, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>
>> On 6/29/2022 7:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Add bindings for the Qualcomm Bandwidth Monitor device providing
>>> performance data on interconnects. The bindings describe only BWMON CPU
>>> (version 4), e.g. the instance which appeared for the first on Qualcomm
>>> MSM8998 SoC and is also used on SDM845. This BWMON device sits between
>>> CPU and Last Level Cache Controller.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>> Acked-by: Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> .../interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..76e09658d615
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Qualcomm Interconnect Bandwidth Monitor
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> + Bandwidth Monitor measures current throughput on buses between various NoC
>>> + fabrics and provides information when it crosses configured thresholds.
>>> +
>>> + Certain SoCs might have more than one Bandwidth Monitors, for example on SDM845::
>>> + - Measuring the bandwidth between CPUs and Last Level Cache Controller -
>>> + called LLCC BWMON,
>>> + - Measuring the bandwidth between Last Level Cache Controller and memory (DDR).
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + oneOf:
>>> + - items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon
>>> + - const: qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon
>>> + - const: qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon # BWMON v4
>>> +
>>> + interconnects:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + interrupts:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + operating-points-v2: true
>>> + opp-table: true
>>> +
>>> + reg:
>>> + # BWMON v4 (currently described) and BWMON v5 use one register address
>>> + # space. BWMON v2 uses two register spaces - not yet described.
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - interconnects
>>> + - interrupts
>>> + - operating-points-v2
>>> + - opp-table
>>> + - reg
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> + - |
>>> + #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm845.h>
>>> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>> +
>>> + pmu@1436400 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon", "qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon";
>>
>> so with this compatible fallback scheme, I am trying to understand what
>> do I need to do if I have to add support for another SoC for instance.
>>
>> I just update the binding with the new SoC compatible (lets say qcom,sc7280-llcc-bwmon)
>> and in the device tree node use it as
>> compatible = "qcom,sc7280-llcc-bwmon", "qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon", "qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon";
>> without any updates in the driver?
>
> I expect:
> "qcom,sc7280-llcc-bwmon", "qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon";
> and you need to add sc7280 compatible to the driver. The actual proper
> solution in my patch would be to use msm8998 compatible in the driver,
> but I did not test MSM8998.
>
> Maybe we should switch to that anyway?

Right, looks like without it every new SoC compatible added would need a dummy
update in the driver even though you really don't need to do anything different
in the driver.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-30 13:32    [W:0.054 / U:2.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site