[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 0/7] Generic Ticket Spinlocks
On Thu, 05 May 2022 04:09:46 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 5:36 PM Palmer Dabbelt <> wrote:
>> Comments on the v3 looked pretty straight-forward, essentially just that
>> RCsc issue I'd missed from the v2 and some cleanups. A part of the
>> discussion some additional possible cleanups came up related to the
>> qrwlock headers, but I hadn't looked at those yet and I had already
>> handled everything else. This went on the back burner, but given that
>> LoongArch appears to want to use it for their new port I think it's best
>> to just run with this and defer the other cleanups until later.
>> I've placed the whole patch set at palmer/tspinlock-v4, and also tagged
>> the asm-generic bits as generic-ticket-spinlocks-v4. Ideally I'd like
>> to take that, along with the RISC-V patches, into my tree as there's
>> some RISC-V specific testing before things land in linux-next. This
>> passes all my testing, but I'll hold off until merging things anywhere
>> else to make sure everyone has time to look. There's no rush on my end
>> for this one, but I don't want to block LoongArch so I'll try to stay a
>> bit more on top of this one.
> I took another look as well and everything seems fine. I had expected
> that I would merge it into the asm-generic tree first and did not bother
> sending a separate Reviewed-by tag, but I agree that it's best if you
> create the branch.
> Can you add 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <>'
> to each patch and send me a pull request for a v5 tag so we can
> merge that into both the riscv and the asm-generic trees?

Yep. There were some other minor comments, I'll clean those up as well
and send something soon.

 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-06 16:35    [W:0.123 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site