Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | Lu Baolu <> | Subject | [PATCH 4/5] iommu/vt-d: Remove domain_update_iommu_snooping() | Date | Sun, 1 May 2022 19:24:33 +0800 |
| |
The IOMMU force snooping capability is not required to be consistent among all the IOMMUs anymore. Remove force snooping capability check in the IOMMU hot-add path and domain_update_iommu_snooping() becomes a dead code now.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 34 +--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c index 3c1c228f9031..d5808495eb64 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c @@ -533,33 +533,6 @@ static void domain_update_iommu_coherency(struct dmar_domain *domain) rcu_read_unlock(); } -static bool domain_update_iommu_snooping(struct intel_iommu *skip) -{ - struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd; - struct intel_iommu *iommu; - bool ret = true; - - rcu_read_lock(); - for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) { - if (iommu != skip) { - /* - * If the hardware is operating in the scalable mode, - * the snooping control is always supported since we - * always set PASID-table-entry.PGSNP bit if the domain - * is managed outside (UNMANAGED). - */ - if (!sm_supported(iommu) && - !ecap_sc_support(iommu->ecap)) { - ret = false; - break; - } - } - } - rcu_read_unlock(); - - return ret; -} - static int domain_update_iommu_superpage(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *skip) { @@ -3593,12 +3566,7 @@ static int intel_iommu_add(struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru) iommu->name); return -ENXIO; } - if (!ecap_sc_support(iommu->ecap) && - domain_update_iommu_snooping(iommu)) { - pr_warn("%s: Doesn't support snooping.\n", - iommu->name); - return -ENXIO; - } + sp = domain_update_iommu_superpage(NULL, iommu) - 1; if (sp >= 0 && !(cap_super_page_val(iommu->cap) & (1 << sp))) { pr_warn("%s: Doesn't support large page.\n", -- 2.25.1
|  |