Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 07/18] MIPS: DTS: jz4780: fix otg node as reported by dtbscheck | From | "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <> | Date | Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:37:51 +0200 |
| |
> Am 09.04.2022 um 15:23 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>: > > On 09/04/2022 15:18, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > hould have a specific compatible. >>>> Please mention why it does not. >>> >>> Agreed. The "snps,dwc2" should be a fallback string, otherwise there is no way to uniquely identify the JZ4780 implementation of the IP. >> >> Well, there is no specifc implementation and driver for it. So no need to uniquely identify it. > > Specific implementation and driver are not arguments here. This does not > matter. It's really unrelated argument.
The argumentation is in reverse: if there is no need for a specialized driver or implementation, why is there is a need to define a specialization.
Your argument was: "there is no way to uniquely identify the JZ4780 implementation of the IP"
My question is: "what do we need that for?"
> Bindings are not about implementation in Linux. Implementation can > change, so bindings should also?
No. Implementations should be agnostic.
|  |