[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Patch v7 3/4] dt-bindings: memory: Update reg/reg-names validation
On 24/04/2022 07:20, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
>>> New, added properties cannot be required. That's an ABI break.
>> This is handled in driver code to make sure driver works with old dts
>> as well. So is this bindings change fine or shall I change it such that
>> dt bindings check shall pass with older dts as well?
>> Or as mentioned by Dmitry, I can update the commit message to reflect
>> that ABI change is intended and driver is compatible with older DTBs as
>> well.
> Hi Rob,
> Can you please confirm how shall I go in next version?
> Is it fine for dt bindings check to fail if driver is compatible with
> old as well as new dts? Or dt bindings check shall pass with old as
> well as new dts?
The driver works fine without reg-names and accepts old DTB, right? In
such case, just mention this in commit msg, that the bindings require
reg-names but backwards compatibility will be preserved in the driver. I
think it's fine to alter bindings such way.

Best regards,

 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-24 16:36    [W:0.051 / U:3.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site