[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 34/49] spi: cadence-quadspi: fix protocol setup for non-1-1-X operations
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 01:07:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 01:49:19PM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows
>readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
>you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
>discussion is being addressed.
>> what's your plan regarding this patch and the other patch I sent [1]? I
>> think there has been some confusion regarding which solution we want to
>> backport to stable kernels (well, at least I'm confused...)
>Well, it's up to the stable people what they choose to backport -
>they're generally fairly aggressive about what they pick up so I guess
>they want to take this one?
>> I'm fine with this patch getting backported, but in that case [1]
>> doesn't make sense anymore (in fact I expected this patch to be dropped
>> for now when I submitted [1], due to Pratyush Yadav's concerns).
>> [1]
>For the benefit of those playing at home that's "spi: cadence-quadspi:
>fix incorrect supports_op() return value". It's much more the sort of
>thing I'd expect to see backported to stable so it seems good from that
>point of view.

I'm a bit confused as I don't see the other patch in Linus's tree?

I'll queue this one up then...


 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-17 23:34    [W:0.071 / U:7.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site