Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:33:28 -0400 | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 34/49] spi: cadence-quadspi: fix protocol setup for non-1-1-X operations |
| |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 01:07:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 01:49:19PM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > >Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows >readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what >you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the >discussion is being addressed. > >> what's your plan regarding this patch and the other patch I sent [1]? I >> think there has been some confusion regarding which solution we want to >> backport to stable kernels (well, at least I'm confused...) > >Well, it's up to the stable people what they choose to backport - >they're generally fairly aggressive about what they pick up so I guess >they want to take this one? > >> I'm fine with this patch getting backported, but in that case [1] >> doesn't make sense anymore (in fact I expected this patch to be dropped >> for now when I submitted [1], due to Pratyush Yadav's concerns). > >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/spi-devel-general/patch/20220406132832.199777-1-matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com/ > >For the benefit of those playing at home that's "spi: cadence-quadspi: >fix incorrect supports_op() return value". It's much more the sort of >thing I'd expect to see backported to stable so it seems good from that >point of view.
I'm a bit confused as I don't see the other patch in Linus's tree?
I'll queue this one up then...
-- Thanks, Sasha
|  |