Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 10 Apr 2022 11:33:33 +0200 (CEST) | From | Richard Weinberger <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: fix error return code in winch_tramp() |
| |
----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Thorsten Leemhuis" <regressions@leemhuis.info> > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. Top-posting for once, > to make this easily accessible to everyone. > > Zhen Lei, Richard, what's up here? Below regression report is more than > two weeks old now and afaics didn't even get a single reply.
Sorry, but UML is leisure pursuit, so I can only work on it when my schedule permits it. > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > > P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of > reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack > knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately > will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope > that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me > in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record > straight. > > > > On 23.03.22 20:41, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
[...]
>> in case it helps. I am happy to provide more information or test patches >> as necessary.
Nathan, can you provide me the error code from os_set_fd_block()? My best guess is that setting the fd is optional here and UML does not expect failure here.
Thanks, //richard
|  |