Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | cgel.zte@gmail ... | Subject | [PATCH] wil6210: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync | Date | Mon, 11 Apr 2022 01:36:02 +0000 |
| |
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pm.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pm.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pm.c index ed4df561e5c5..f521af575e9b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pm.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pm.c @@ -445,10 +445,9 @@ int wil_pm_runtime_get(struct wil6210_priv *wil) int rc; struct device *dev = wil_to_dev(wil); - rc = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); + rc = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev); if (rc < 0) { - wil_err(wil, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed, rc = %d\n", rc); - pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); + wil_err(wil, "pm_runtime_resume_and_get() failed, rc = %d\n", rc); return rc; } -- 2.25.1
|  |