Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | cgel.zte@gmail ... | Subject | [PATCH] drivers: dma: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync | Date | Mon, 11 Apr 2022 01:35:04 +0000 |
| |
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> --- drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c b/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c index 375e7e647df6..64bad5681447 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c @@ -274,11 +274,9 @@ static int mtk_uart_apdma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan) unsigned int status; int ret; - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(mtkd->ddev.dev); - if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(chan->device->dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(mtkd->ddev.dev); + if (ret < 0) return ret; - } mtk_uart_apdma_write(c, VFF_ADDR, 0); mtk_uart_apdma_write(c, VFF_THRE, 0); -- 2.25.1
|  |