lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/7] usb: typec: mux: Check dev_set_name() return value
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 06:33:47AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 07 Mar 02:08 PST 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 07:40:36PM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > It's possible that dev_set_name() returns -ENOMEM, catch and handle this.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Shouldn't we have a Fixes tag and be sent separately for this cycle?
> >
>
> It seems appropriate to add:
>
> Fixes: 3370db35193b ("usb: typec: Registering real device entries for the muxes")
>
>
> If the maintainer would prefer to get this into v5.18, it could either
> be picked ahead of the rest of the series, or I can resubmit it on its
> own. I don't think it's a critical fix though.

Me neither.

Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>

> > > Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes since v3:
> > > - New patch
> > >
> > > drivers/usb/typec/mux.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c b/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > > index c8340de0ed49..d2aaf294b649 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > > @@ -131,8 +131,11 @@ typec_switch_register(struct device *parent,
> > > sw->dev.class = &typec_mux_class;
> > > sw->dev.type = &typec_switch_dev_type;
> > > sw->dev.driver_data = desc->drvdata;
> > > - dev_set_name(&sw->dev, "%s-switch",
> > > - desc->name ? desc->name : dev_name(parent));
> > > + ret = dev_set_name(&sw->dev, "%s-switch", desc->name ? desc->name : dev_name(parent));
> >
> > We may use shorten form of the ternary
> >
> > ret = dev_set_name(&sw->dev, "%s-switch", desc->name ?: dev_name(parent));
> >
> > at the same time, but it's up to you.
> >
>
> I looked at it, but felt it was an unrelated change and decided to leave
> it as is.
>
> > Either way code looks good to me,
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Bjorn
>
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + put_device(&sw->dev);
> > > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > ret = device_add(&sw->dev);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > @@ -338,8 +341,11 @@ typec_mux_register(struct device *parent, const struct typec_mux_desc *desc)
> > > mux->dev.class = &typec_mux_class;
> > > mux->dev.type = &typec_mux_dev_type;
> > > mux->dev.driver_data = desc->drvdata;
> > > - dev_set_name(&mux->dev, "%s-mux",
> > > - desc->name ? desc->name : dev_name(parent));
> > > + ret = dev_set_name(&mux->dev, "%s-mux", desc->name ? desc->name : dev_name(parent));
> >
> > Ditto.
> >
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + put_device(&mux->dev);
> > > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > ret = device_add(&mux->dev);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > --
> > > 2.33.1
> > >
> >
> > --
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> >
> >

--
heikki

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-07 15:54    [W:0.044 / U:0.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site