lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] gpiolib: check for overflow when reading the 'ngpios' property
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 10:53 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 12:23:03AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 12:19 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 12:11 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The ngpio fields both in struct gpio_device as well as gpio_chip are
> > > > 16-bit unsigned integers. Let's not risk an overflow and check if the
> > > > property value represented as a 32-bit unsigned integer is not greater
> > > > than U16_MAX.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > + if (ngpios > U16_MAX) {
> > > > + ret = EINVAL;
> > > > + goto err_free_descs;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > I don't think it's a fatal error in this case. I would perhaps print a
> > > warning and simply use a masked (which is done implicitly by an
> > > assignment of the different type) value. Note, the above is buggy on
> > > the buggy DTs, where the upper part of the value is not used. After
> > > this patch you effectively make a regression on, yes, broken DTs.
> >
> > Like
> >
> > if (ngpios > U16_MAX)
> > chip_warn(gc, "line cnt %u is greater than supported; use
> > %u\n", ngpios, (u16)ngpio);
>
> Or to be on safer side move this after == 0 check as
>
> if (gc->ngpio != ngpios)
> chip_warn(gc, "line cnt %u is greater than supported; use %u\n", ngpios, gc->ngpio);
>

ngpios is not necessarily used so this check must be in the scope of
the device property read (inside the if (gc->ngpio == 0) { block).

Bart

> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-07 11:51    [W:0.031 / U:1.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site