Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | Yixuan Cao <> | Subject | [PATCH] mm/vmalloc.c: fix a comment | Date | Sun, 27 Feb 2022 16:45:44 +0800 |
| |
Dear Sir/Madam,
The sentence "but the mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving" should be rephrased with "but the mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving" where "mempolicy" is a struct name.
Thanks and best regards, Yixuan Cao
Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn> --- mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index b454cf1a261f..89d48d8eb20c 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -2905,7 +2905,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid, /* memory allocation should consider mempolicy, we can't * wrongly use nearest node when nid == NUMA_NO_NODE, * otherwise memory may be allocated in only one node, - * but mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving. + * but mempolicy want to alloc memory by interleaving. */ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy(bulk_gfp, -- 2.31.1
|  |