lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 45/49] ACPI: replace nodes__weight with nodes_weight_ge for numa
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 08:18:27PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 1:31 AM Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > acpi_map_pxm_to_node() calls nodes_weight() to compare the weight
> > of nodemask with a given number. We can do it more efficiently with
> > nodes_weight_eq() because conditional nodes_weight may stop
> > traversing the nodemask earlier, as soon as condition is (or is not)
> > met.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> > index 3b818ab186be..fe7a7996f553 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ int acpi_map_pxm_to_node(int pxm)
> > node = pxm_to_node_map[pxm];
> >
> > if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> > - if (nodes_weight(nodes_found_map) >= MAX_NUMNODES)
> > + if (nodes_weight_ge(nodes_found_map, MAX_NUMNODES))
> > return NUMA_NO_NODE;
> > node = first_unset_node(nodes_found_map);
> > __acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm, node);
> > --
>
> Applied as 5.18 material, thanks!

It depends on patches 44 and 26. Are you applying them too?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-14 20:54    [W:0.082 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site