lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 36/40] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs
From
Date


On 1/27/22 10:21 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 09:43:28AM -0600, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> Version 2 of GHCB specification provides SNP_GUEST_REQUEST and
>> SNP_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST NAE that can be used by the SNP guest to communicate
>> with the PSP.
>>
>> While at it, add a snp_issue_guest_request() helper that can be used by
>
> Not "that can" but "that will".
>
Noted.

>>
>> +/* Guest message request error code */
>> +#define SNP_GUEST_REQ_INVALID_LEN BIT_ULL(32)
>
> SZ_4G is more descriptive, perhaps...
>

I am okay with using SZ_4G but per the spec they don't spell that its 4G
size. It says bit 32 will should be set on error.



>> +
>> + ret = sev_es_ghcb_hv_call(ghcb, true, NULL, exit_code, input->req_gpa, input->resp_gpa);
> ^^^^^
>
> That's ctxt which is accessed without a NULL check in
> verify_exception_info().
>
> Why aren't you allocating a ctxt on stack like the other callers do?

Typically the sev_es_ghcb_hv_handler() is called from #VC handler, which
provides the context structure. But in this and PSC case, the caller is
not a #VC handler, so we don't have a context structure. But as you
pointed, we could allocate context structure on the stack and pass it
down so that verify_exception_info() does not cause a panic with NULL
deference (when HV violates the spec and inject exception while handling
this NAE).

thanks

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-27 18:03    [W:0.163 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site