lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: leds: maxim,max77693: convert to dtschema
From
On 04/01/2022 16:09, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 11:53:37AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/12/2021 18:34, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:39:27 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> Convert the LEDs bindings of Maxim MAX77693 MUIC to DT schema format.
>>>> The existing bindings were defined in ../bindings/mfd/max77693.txt.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml
>>>>
>>>
>>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>>
>>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>>
>>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>>> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.example.dt.yaml: led-controller@0: 'reg' does not match any of the regexes: '^([a-z]+-)?led[01]?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml
>>>
>>> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77693.yaml
>>>
>>> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1573762
>>>
>>> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
>>> series is generally the most recent rc1.
>>>
>>
>> I updated my yamllint and dtschema, run with DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m but
>> still cannot reproduce it. Probably because I based on linux-next, so
>> maybe this was a fixed issue in leds/common.yaml.
>
> Are you setting DT_SCHEMA_FILES, because the error is in
> common.yaml but caused by this schema.
>
> Clearly, 'reg' is not defined here. And there is no change to
> common.yaml in next.
>

Indeed, I'll fix this up.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-11 16:05    [W:0.072 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site