Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | Florian Fainelli <> | Subject | [PATCH] PM / sleep: Do not assume that "mem" is always present | Date | Tue, 14 Sep 2021 19:23:28 -0700 |
| |
An implementation of suspend_ops is allowed to reject the PM_SUSPEND_MEM suspend type from its ->valid() callback, we should not assume that it is always present as this is not a correct reflection of what a firmware interface may support.
Fixes: 406e79385f32 ("PM / sleep: System sleep state selection interface rework") Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> --- kernel/power/suspend.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/power/suspend.c b/kernel/power/suspend.c index eb75f394a059..02e306ad8db8 100644 --- a/kernel/power/suspend.c +++ b/kernel/power/suspend.c @@ -171,8 +171,7 @@ static bool valid_state(suspend_state_t state) void __init pm_states_init(void) { - /* "mem" and "freeze" are always present in /sys/power/state. */ - pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM]; + /* "freeze" is always present in /sys/power/state. */ pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE]; /* * Suspend-to-idle should be supported even without any suspend_ops, @@ -214,6 +213,7 @@ void suspend_set_ops(const struct platform_suspend_ops *ops) } if (valid_state(PM_SUSPEND_MEM)) { mem_sleep_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = mem_sleep_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM]; + pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM]; if (mem_sleep_default >= PM_SUSPEND_MEM) mem_sleep_current = PM_SUSPEND_MEM; } -- 2.25.1
|  |