Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/23] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness | From | Robin Murphy <> | Date | Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:06:41 +0100 |
| |
On 2021-07-26 09:13, John Garry wrote: > On 21/07/2021 19:20, Robin Murphy wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> First off, yes, this conflicts with just about everything else >> currently in-flight. Sorry about that. If it stands up to initial review >> then I'll start giving some thought to how to fit everything together >> (particularly John's cleanup of strictness defaults, which I'd be >> inclined to fold into a v2 of this series). > > It seems to me that patch #20 is the only real conflict, and that is > just a different form of mine in that passthrough, strict, and lazy are > under a single choice, as opposed to passthrough being a separate config > (for mine). And on that point, I did assume that we would have a > different sysfs file for strict vs lazy in this series, and not a new > domain type. But I assume that there is a good reason for that.
Yes, as mentioned by patch #18 it helps a surprising number of things fall into place really neatly.
> Anyway, I'd really like to see my series just merged now.
Sure, I was going to say I can happily rebase on top of your series as-is if Joerg wants to apply it first, and now that's just happened :)
Cheers, Robin.
|  |