[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled clocks enabled clocks

> AFAICT in practice it's a mandatory requirement in I²C subsys (in the
> past you hadn't accepted a patch from us without a tag from the
> maintainer) which makes it equal to sending PR by a maintainer. PR

Right. I require a tag from the driver maintainer.

> makes less burden since subsys maintainer don't need to run many tools
> or a tool many times to get the pile of patches.

I had driver maintainers who found it difficult to have a public tree to
pull from or forgot how to send properly prepared pull requests. They
were happy to send Rev-by, though. And I am happy with that, too. At
least in I2C, picking up patches is small work compared to the actual

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-26 19:41    [W:0.064 / U:1.972 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site