lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC v1 2/7] rtw88: Use rtw_iterate_vifs where the iterator reads or writes registers
Hello Ping-Ke,

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:47 AM Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Blumenstingl [mailto:martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2021 4:41 AM
> > To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: tony0620emma@gmail.com; kvalo@codeaurora.org; johannes@sipsolutions.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Neo Jou; Jernej Skrabec; Martin Blumenstingl
> > Subject: [PATCH RFC v1 2/7] rtw88: Use rtw_iterate_vifs where the iterator reads or writes registers
> >
> > Upcoming SDIO support may sleep in the read/write handlers. Switch
> > all users of rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic() which are either reading or
> > writing a register to rtw_iterate_vifs().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c | 6 +++---
> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/ps.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
> > index c6364837e83b..207161a8f5bd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
> > @@ -229,8 +229,8 @@ static void rtw_watch_dog_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > rtw_phy_dynamic_mechanism(rtwdev);
> >
> > data.rtwdev = rtwdev;
> > - /* use atomic version to avoid taking local->iflist_mtx mutex */
> > - rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic(rtwdev, rtw_vif_watch_dog_iter, &data);
> > +
> > + rtw_iterate_vifs(rtwdev, rtw_vif_watch_dog_iter, &data);
>
> You revert the fix of [1].
Thanks for bringing this to my attention!

> I think we can move out rtw_chip_cfg_csi_rate() from rtw_dynamic_csi_rate(), and
> add/set a field cfg_csi_rate to itera data. Then, we do rtw_chip_cfg_csi_rate()
> outside iterate function. Therefore, we can keep the atomic version of iterate_vifs.
just to make sure that I understand this correctly:
rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic can be the iterator as it was before
inside the iterator func I use something like:
iter_data->cfg_csi_rate = rtwvif->bfee.role == RTW_BFEE_SU ||
rtwvif->bfee.role == RTW_BFEE_MU || iter_data->cfg_csi_rate;
(the last iter_data->cfg_csi_rate may read a bit strange, but I think
it's needed because there can be multiple interfaces and if any of
them has cfg_csi_rate true then we need to remember that)
then move the rtw_chip_cfg_csi_rate outside the iterator function,
taking iter_data->cfg_csi_rate to decide whether it needs to be called


Best regards,
Martin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-25 23:34    [W:0.051 / U:2.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site