lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver

> > Obviously, I don't know much about the specs and their wording. Still I
> > wonder if we can't call it a zero length transfer?
>
> Maybe that.

I'd prefer it.

> > This is allowed by
> > the I2C standard and SMBus has even a proper name for it (SMBUS_QUICK).
> > From my point of view, I would not say it is device specific because
> > devices are expected to ACK such a message.
>
> Actually we should skip the last line from my diff, i.e. completely
> drop "and result for such a request is I2C device specific".

Sounds good.

> The device (host in virtio spec terminology) still needs to return
> success/failure as it does for other requests. Nothing special here.

Ack.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-29 13:50    [W:0.131 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site