lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH resend 2/8] sched: core scheduling tagging infrastructure
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:19:57PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:10 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> > I've spend the past few hours rewriting patches #2 and #3, and adapting
> > #4. The thing was working before I added SHARE_FROM back and introduced
> > GET, but now I'm seeing a few FAILs from the selftest.
> >
> > I'm too tired to make sense of anything much, or even focus my eyes
> > consistently, so I'll have to prod at it some more next week, but I've
> > pushed out the lot to my queue.git:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=sched/core-sched
>
> Thanks, I'll take a look next week.

OK, fixed the fails. My tired head made it unconditionally return the
cookie-id of 'current' instead of task. Pushed out an update.

> > Also, we really need a better name than coretag.c.
>
> Yea, we don't really otherwise use the phrase "tagging". core_sched.c
> is probably too confusing given we have sched/core.c.

Right, so I tried core_sched and my fingers already hate it as much as
kernel/scftorture.c (which I'd assumed my fingers would get used to
eventually, but noooo).

Looking at kernel/sched/ C is very overrepresented, so we really don't
want another I think. B, E, G, H, J, K, N, seem to still be available in
the first half of the alphabet. Maybe, bonghits.c, gabbleduck.c ?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-29 11:58    [W:0.104 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site