lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] objtool,x86: Rewrite retpoline thunk calls
From
Date
On 20.02.21 23:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 06:41:01PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> - if we had negative alternatives objtool doesn't need to actually
>>> rewrite code in this case. It could simply emit alternative entries
>>> and call it a day.
>>
>> I don't mind the negative alt per se - I mind the implementation I saw.
>> I'm sure we can come up with something nicer, like, for example, struct
>> alt_instr.flags to denote that this feature is a NOT feature.
>
> So you don't like the ~ or - on cpuid? ISTR we talked about
> alt_instr::flags before, but Google isn't playing ball today so I can't
> seem to find it.

If you want I can cook up a patch and include it in my paravirt
cleanup series.

Juergen
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-keys][unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-21 06:49    [W:0.061 / U:11.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site