lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH REBASE] dt-bindings: pinctrl: use pinctrl.yaml
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 2:47 AM Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 06.12.2021 23:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 12:32 AM Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> >>
> >> Also fix some examples to avoid warnings like:
> >> brcm,ns-pinmux.example.dt.yaml: pin-controller@1800c1c0: $nodename:0: 'pin-controller@1800c1c0' does not match '^pinctrl|pinmux@[0-9a-f]+$'
> >
> > I think you missed some. linux-next now has these warnings:
>
> Oops, sorry, I think I didn't test MFD bindings *after* modifying
> pinctrl bindings.
>
>
> > /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cirrus,madera.example.dt.yaml:
> > codec@1a: $nodename:0: 'codec@1a' does not match
> > '^(pinctrl|pinmux)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$'
> > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cirrus,madera.yaml
>
> I'm not sure how to deal with this one. If you take a look at
> cirrus,madera.yaml it seems to be some complex MFD that is a sound
> device with pin controller and regulator.
>
> I'm not sure: is using pinctrl@ node for that hardware is a correct
> choice?

No, I think you have to drop specifying the node name.

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-07 16:17    [W:0.060 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site