lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: leds: maxim,max77693: convert to dtschema
From
On 29/12/2021 18:34, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:39:27 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Convert the LEDs bindings of Maxim MAX77693 MUIC to DT schema format.
>> The existing bindings were defined in ../bindings/mfd/max77693.txt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml
>>
>
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>
> yamllint warnings/errors:
>
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.example.dt.yaml: led-controller@0: 'reg' does not match any of the regexes: '^([a-z]+-)?led[01]?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml
>
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77693.yaml
>
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1573762
>
> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
> series is generally the most recent rc1.
>

I updated my yamllint and dtschema, run with DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m but
still cannot reproduce it. Probably because I based on linux-next, so
maybe this was a fixed issue in leds/common.yaml.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-30 11:54    [W:0.065 / U:1.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site