[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/50] wilc1000: rework tx path to use sk_buffs throughout
On Thu, 2021-12-23 at 06:16 +0000, wrote:
> On 23/12/21 06:44, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > OK, so I'm nervous about such a large patch series, but it took a lot
> > of work to break things down into atomic changes. This should be it
> > for the transmit path as far as I'm concerned.
> Thanks David for the efforts to break down the changes. I am still
> reviewing and testing the previous series and found some inconsistent
> results. I am not sure about the cause of the difference. For some
> tests, the throughput is improved(~1Mbps) but for some CI tests, the
> throughput is less compared(~1Mbps in same range) to the previous.
> Though not observed much difference.

There shouldn't be any significant performance regressions. From my
observations, +/-1Mbps in throughput is quite possible due to cache-

> Now the new patches are added to the same series so it is difficult to
> review them in one go.

Ah, OK, sorry about that. After the automated error reports, I waited
for a day or two and after not seeing any further feedback, I figured
it'd be fine to add to the series.

I take it that as long as a patch shows up in patchworks with a
state==Action required, I should assume the patch is being worked on
(or will be worked on).

> I have a request, incase there are new patches please include them in
> separate series.

I'm not planning on adding more patches.


 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-23 16:25    [W:0.214 / U:0.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site