lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] mm/util.c: Make kvfree() safe for calling while holding spinlocks
Date
One codepath in find_alloc_undo() calls kvfree() while holding a spinlock.
Since vfree() can sleep this is a bug.

Previously, the code path used kfree(), and kfree() is safe to be called
while holding a spinlock.

Minghao proposed to fix this by updating find_alloc_undo().

Alternate proposal to fix this: Instead of changing find_alloc_undo(),
change kvfree() so that the same rules as for kfree() apply:
Having different rules for kfree() and kvfree() just asks for bugs.

Disadvantage: Releasing vmalloc'ed memory will be delayed a bit.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Reported-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211222081026.484058-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn/
Fixes: fc37a3b8b438 ("[PATCH] ipc sem: use kvmalloc for sem_undo allocation")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
---
mm/util.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index 741ba32a43ac..7f9181998835 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -610,12 +610,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmalloc_node);
* It is slightly more efficient to use kfree() or vfree() if you are certain
* that you know which one to use.
*
- * Context: Either preemptible task context or not-NMI interrupt.
+ * Context: Any context except NMI interrupt.
*/
void kvfree(const void *addr)
{
if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr))
- vfree(addr);
+ vfree_atomic(addr);
else
kfree(addr);
}
--
2.33.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-22 20:49    [W:0.152 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site