lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 12/19] x86/fpu: Prepare KVM for bringing XFD state back in-sync
Date
On Tue, Dec 07 2021 at 19:03, Yang Zhong wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> Guest may toggle IA32_XFD in high frequency as it is part of the fpstate
> information (features, sizes, xfd) and swapped in task context switch.
>
> To minimize the trap overhead of writes to this MSR, one optimization
> is to allow guest direct write thus eliminate traps. However MSR
> passthrough implies that guest_fpstate::xfd and per-cpu xfd cache might
> be out of sync with the current IA32_XFD value by the guest.
>
> This suggests KVM needs to re-sync guest_fpstate::xfd and per-cpu cache
> with IA32_XFD before the vCPU thread might be preempted or interrupted.
>
> This patch provides a helper function for the re-sync purpose.

Provide a ....

> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jing Liu <jing2.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
> ---
> (To Thomas): the original name kvm_update_guest_xfd_state() in
> your sample code is renamed to xfd_sync_state() in this patch. In
> concept it is a general helper to bring software values in-sync with
> the MSR value after they become out-of-sync. KVM is just the
> first out-of-sync usage on this helper, so a neutral name may make
> more sense. But if you prefer to the original name we can also
> change back.

There is no need for a general helper, really.

It's KVM specific and should go into KVM section in core.c next to the
other thing vs. the XFD update.

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-11 00:13    [W:0.404 / U:1.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site