lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v20 2/2] wireless: Initial driver submission for pureLiFi STA devices
Date
Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:00:55AM +0100, Srinivasan Raju wrote:
>> This driver implementation has been based on the zd1211rw driver
>>
>> Driver is based on 802.11 softMAC Architecture and uses
>> native 802.11 for configuration and management
>>
>> The driver is compiled and tested in ARM, x86 architectures and
>> compiled in powerpc architecture
>
> Just small style issues in this review.

Very good review comments, kiitos :)

>> +static const struct ieee80211_ops plfxlc_ops = {
>> + .tx = plfxlc_op_tx,
>> + .start = plfxlc_op_start,
>> + .stop = plfxlc_op_stop,
>> + .add_interface = plfxlc_op_add_interface,
>> + .remove_interface = plfxlc_op_remove_interface,
>> + .set_rts_threshold = purelifi_set_rts_threshold,
>> + .config = plfxlc_op_config,
>> + .configure_filter = plfxlc_op_configure_filter,
>> + .bss_info_changed = plfxlc_op_bss_info_changed,
>> + .get_stats = purelifi_get_stats,
>> + .get_et_sset_count = purelifi_get_et_sset_count,
>> + .get_et_stats = purelifi_get_et_stats,
>> + .get_et_strings = purelifi_get_et_strings,
>> +};
>
> Just asking why some prefixes are purelifi and some are plfxlc?

Good point, I guess this is because the driver was called purelifi
before. I think throughout the driver "plfxlc_" should be used and
"purelifi_" should be dropped altogether.

--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-28 09:25    [W:0.104 / U:1.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site