[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 21/20] signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV)
Geert Uytterhoeven <> writes:

> Hi Eric,
> Patch 21/20?

In reviewing another part of the patchset Linus asked if force_sigsegv
could go away. It can't completely but I can get this far.

Given that it is just a cleanup it makes most sense to me as an
additional patch on top of what is already here.

> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:52 PM Eric W. Biederman
> <> wrote:
>> Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing
>> to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is
>> wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer.
>> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <>
>> arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <>

Thank you.


 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-21 15:35    [W:0.091 / U:14.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site