Messages in this thread |  | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:33:51 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 21/20] signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV) |
| |
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Hi Eric, > > Patch 21/20?
In reviewing another part of the patchset Linus asked if force_sigsegv could go away. It can't completely but I can get this far.
Given that it is just a cleanup it makes most sense to me as an additional patch on top of what is already here.
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:52 PM Eric W. Biederman > <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote: >> Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing >> to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is >> wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer. >> >> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> > >> arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Thank you.
Eric
|  |