| From | Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <> | Date | Thu, 21 Oct 2021 10:32:10 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 21/20] signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV) |
| |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:52 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote: > > > Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing > to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is > wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer. > > Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> > --- > arch/arc/kernel/process.c | 2 +- > arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c | 4 ++-- > arch/s390/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- > arch/um/kernel/trap.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c | 2 +- > fs/exec.c | 2 +- > 8 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
|