lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 2/2] block: kill extra rcu lock/unlock in queue enter
Date
blk_try_enter_queue() already takes rcu_read_lock/unlock, so we can
avoid the second pair in percpu_ref_tryget_live(), use a newly added
percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu().

As rcu_read_lock/unlock imply barrier()s, it's pretty noticeable,
especially for for !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU (default for some distributions),
where __rcu_read_lock/unlock() are not inlined.

3.20% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __rcu_read_unlock
3.05% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __rcu_read_lock

2.52% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __rcu_read_unlock
2.28% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __rcu_read_lock

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 88752e51d2b6..20e76aeb50f5 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_cleanup_queue);
static bool blk_try_enter_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool pm)
{
rcu_read_lock();
- if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter))
+ if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu(&q->q_usage_counter))
goto fail;

/*
--
2.33.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-20 22:04    [W:0.102 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site