lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: memcg/slab: optimize objcg stock draining
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:50:44AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:22:39 -0800 Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
>
> > Imran Khan reported a regression in hackbench results caused by the
> > commit f2fe7b09a52b ("mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects
> > instead of pages").
>
> How large was the regression?

~16% according to Imran's data.

>
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -3122,9 +3122,7 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
> > if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
> > page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->kmem, nr_pages);
> >
> > - page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
> > - if (do_memsw_account())
> > - page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
> > + refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages);
> > }
>
> IOW, which kernel version(s) should we be patching?

5.9+

Thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-06 21:06    [W:0.083 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site