[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kernelci/staging-next bisection: sleep.login on rk3288-rock2-square #2286-staging
On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 03:09:14PM -0500, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Hello Mike,
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 03:47:53PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Thanks for the logs, it seems that implicitly adding reserved regions to
> > memblock.memory wasn't that bright idea :)
> Would it be possible to somehow clean up the hack then?
> The only difference between the clean solution and the hack is that
> the hack intended to achieved the exact same, but without adding the
> reserved regions to memblock.memory.

I didn't consider adding reserved regions to memblock.memory as a clean
solution, this was still a hack, but I didn't think that things are that

I still think we cannot rely on memblock.reserved to detect
memory/zone/node sizes and the boot failure reported here confirms this.

> The comment on that problematic area says the reserved area cannot be
> used for DMA because of some unexplained hw issue, and that doing so
> prevents booting, but since the area got reserved, even with the clean
> solution, it shouldn't have never been used for DMA?
> So I can only imagine that the physical memory region is way more
> problematic than just for DMA. It sounds like that anything that
> touches it, including the CPU, will hang the system, not just DMA. It
> sounds somewhat similar to the other e820 direct mapping issue on x86?

My understanding is that the boot failed because when I implicitly added
the reserved region to memblock.memory the memory size seen by
free_area_init() jumped from 2G to 4G because the reserved area was close
to 4G. The very first allocation would get a chunk from slightly below of
4G and as there is no real memory there, the kernel would crash.

> If you want to test the hack on the arm board to check if it boots you
> can use the below commit:

My take is your solution would boot with this memory configuration, but I
still don't think that using memblock.reserved for zone/node sizing is

> Thanks,
> Andrea

Sincerely yours,

 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-05 10:16    [W:0.076 / U:1.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site