lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 15/15] ipu3-cio2: Add cio2-bridge to ipu3-cio2 driver
From
Date
Hi Kieran

On 04/01/2021 13:35, Kieran Bingham wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Extend this array with ACPI Hardware IDs of devices known to be working
>> + * plus the number of link-frequencies expected by their drivers, along with
>> + * the frequency values in hertz. This is somewhat opportunistic way of adding
>> + * support for this for now in the hopes of a better source for the information
>> + * (possibly some encoded value in the SSDB buffer that we're unaware of)
>> + * becoming apparent in the future.
>> + *
>> + * Do not add an entry for a sensor that is not actually supported.
>> + */
>> +static const struct cio2_sensor_config cio2_supported_sensors[] = {
>> + CIO2_SENSOR_CONFIG("INT33BE", 0),
>> + CIO2_SENSOR_CONFIG("OVTI2680", 0),
> I don't know if these are expressed anywhere else but would it be
> helpful to add a comment, or indicator as to what the actual sensor is
> that is represented by this HID?
>
> I can make an assumption about what an OVTI2680 might be, but the
> INT33BE is quite opaque. It's not clear what support that adds.
>
> Unless no one cares what the sensor is that is, but I would anticipate
> anyone looking here to add a new sensor might want to investigate what
> was already in the table?

Yeah good point. I'll probably alternate comment and entry then, like:


+static const struct cio2_sensor_config cio2_supported_sensors[] = {
+ /* Sensor OVTI5693 */
+ CIO2_SENSOR_CONFIG("INT33BE", 0),
+ /* Sensor OVTI2680 */
+ CIO2_SENSOR_CONFIG("OVTI2680", 0),

As an inline comment won't fit for the sensors that we know link-frequencies for. That sound ok?

>> +static void cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(
>> + struct cio2_sensor *sensor,
>> + const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int i;
>> +
>> + sensor->prop_names = prop_names;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < CIO2_MAX_LANES; i++)
>> + sensor->data_lanes[i] = i + 1;
> Does something support lane swapping somewhere?
> I assume this is just mapping each lane directly through.

I think Sakari said remapping isn't supported in the CIO2 - so yeah this
is just mapping them directly

> Otherwise, I'm quite looking forwards to all of this ;-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Thanks very much!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-04 14:57    [W:0.148 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site