[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/setup: always add the beginning of RAM as memblock.memory
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:04 AM Mike Rapoport <> wrote:
> >
> > That's *particularly* true when the very line above it did a
> > "memblock_reserve()" of the exact same range that the memblock_add()
> > "adds".
> The most correct thing to do would have been to
> memblock_add(0, end_of_first_memory_bank);
> Somewhere at e820__memblock_setup().

You miss my complaint.

Why does the memblock code care about this magical "memblock_add()",
when we just told it that the SAME REGION is reserved by doing a

IOW, I'm not interested in "the correct thing to do would have been
[another memblock_add()]". I'm saying that the memblock code itself is
being confused, and no additional thing should have been required at
all, because we already *did* that memblock_reserve().


Honestly, I'm not seeing it being a good thing to move further towards
memblock code as the primary model for memory initialization, when the
memblock code is so confused.


 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-31 22:59    [W:0.041 / U:8.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site