[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] certs: Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx entries
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 08:41:29AM -0700, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 2021, at 7:03 AM, Mimi Zohar <> wrote:
> >
> > [Cc'ing linux-integrity]
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 11:46 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> >> Jarkko Sakkinen <> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> I suppose a user space tool could be created. But wouldn’t what is
> >>>> currently done in the kernel in this area need to be removed?
> >>>
> >>> Right. I don't think this was a great idea in the first place to
> >>> do to the kernel but since it exists, I guess the patch does make
> >>> sense.
> >>
> >> This information needs to be loaded from the UEFI tables before the system
> >> starts loading any kernel modules or running any programs (if we do
> >> verification of such, which I think IMA can do).
> >
> > There needs to a clear distinction between the pre-boot and post-boot
> > keys. UEFI has its own trust model, which should be limited to UEFI.
> > The .platform keyring was upstreamed and limited to verifying the kexec
> > kernel image. Any other usage of the .platform keyring keys is
> > abusing its intended purpose.
> >
> > The cover letter says, "Anytime the .platform keyring is used, the
> > keys in the .blacklist keyring are referenced, if a matching key is
> > found, the key will be rejected." I don't have a problem with loading
> > the UEFI X509 dbx entries as long as its usage is limited to verifying
> > the kexec kernel image.
> Correct, with my patch, when EFI_CERT_X509_GUID entries are found in the
> dbx, they will only be used during kexec. I believe the latest dbx file on
> contains three of these entires.
> Based on my understanding of why the platform keyring was introduced,
> I intentionally only used these for kexec. I do question the current
> upstream mainline code though. Currently, when EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GUID
> or EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID entries are found in the dbx, they are applied
> everywhere. It seems like there should be a dbx revocation keyring
> equivalent to the current platform keyring that is only used for pre-boot.
> If that is a direction you would like to see this go in the future, let
> me know, I’d be happy to work on it.

I would tend to agree with this.


 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-30 11:27    [W:0.115 / U:2.964 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site