lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cxgb4: fix TLS dependencies again
From
Date
On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 15:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> A previous patch tried to avoid a build failure, but missed one case
> that Kconfig warns about:
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for CHELSIO_T4
> Depends on [m]: NETDEVICES [=y] && ETHERNET [=y] &&
> NET_VENDOR_CHELSIO [=y] && PCI [=y] && (IPV6 [=y] || IPV6 [=y]=n) &&
> (TLS [=m] || TLS [=m]=n)
> Selected by [y]:
> - SCSI_CXGB4_ISCSI [=y] && SCSI_LOWLEVEL [=y] && SCSI [=y] && PCI
> [=y] && INET [=y] && (IPV6 [=y] || IPV6 [=y]=n) && ETHERNET [=y]
> x86_64-linux-ld: drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.o: in
> function `cxgb_select_queue':
> cxgb4_main.c:(.text+0xf5df): undefined reference to
> `tls_validate_xmit_skb'
>
> When any of the dependencies of CHELSIO_T4 are not met, then
> SCSI_CXGB4_ISCSI must not 'select' it either.
>
> Fix it by mirroring the network driver dependencies on the iscsi
> driver. A more invasive but also more reliable alternative would
> be to use 'depends on CHELSIO_T4' instead.
>
> Fixes: 659fbdcf2f14 ("cxgb4: Fix build failure when CONFIG_TLS=m")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/Kconfig
> b/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/Kconfig
> index 8b0deece9758..2af88a55fbca 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/Kconfig
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> config SCSI_CXGB4_ISCSI
> tristate "Chelsio T4 iSCSI support"
> - depends on PCI && INET && (IPV6 || IPV6=n)
> + depends on PCI && INET && (IPV6 || IPV6=n) && (TLS || TLS=n)
> depends on THERMAL || !THERMAL
> depends on ETHERNET
> depends on TLS || TLS=n

I thought all separated depends statements were the equivalent of && in
a single statement. If so, how does repeating TLS || TLS=n twice fix
the problem? This sounds more like we have some sort of bug in our
Kconfig apparatus.

James


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-03 17:54    [W:0.039 / U:0.960 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site