lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: arm64: Remove hyp_symbol_addr
On Tue, 05 Jan 2021 18:05:41 +0000,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hyp code used the hyp_symbol_addr helper to force PC-relative addressing
> because absolute addressing results in kernel VAs due to the way hyp
> code is linked. This is not true anymore, so remove the helper and
> update all of its users.
>
> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 26 ------------------------
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-smp.c | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/psci-relay.c | 24 +++++++++++-----------
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> index 8a33d83ea843..22d933e9b59e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> @@ -199,32 +199,6 @@ extern void __vgic_v3_init_lrs(void);
>
> extern u32 __kvm_get_mdcr_el2(void);
>
> -#if defined(GCC_VERSION) && GCC_VERSION < 50000
> -#define SYM_CONSTRAINT "i"
> -#else
> -#define SYM_CONSTRAINT "S"
> -#endif
> -
> -/*
> - * Obtain the PC-relative address of a kernel symbol
> - * s: symbol
> - *
> - * The goal of this macro is to return a symbol's address based on a
> - * PC-relative computation, as opposed to a loading the VA from a
> - * constant pool or something similar. This works well for HYP, as an
> - * absolute VA is guaranteed to be wrong. Only use this if trying to
> - * obtain the address of a symbol (i.e. not something you obtained by
> - * following a pointer).
> - */
> -#define hyp_symbol_addr(s) \
> - ({ \
> - typeof(s) *addr; \
> - asm("adrp %0, %1\n" \
> - "add %0, %0, :lo12:%1\n" \
> - : "=r" (addr) : SYM_CONSTRAINT (&s)); \
> - addr; \
> - })
> -

This hunk is going to conflict in a fairly benign way with the
removal of the GCC workaround which I think Will queued for 5.12.
I'll work something out...

Thanks,

M.

--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-23 14:56    [W:0.222 / U:1.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site