lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: adjust to clang-version.sh removal
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 05:15:56PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:01 PM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit 6c8ad4427f6e ("kbuild: check the minimum compiler version in
> > Kconfig") removed ./scripts/clang-version.sh and moved its content to
> > ./scripts/cc-version.sh.
> >
> > Since then, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns complains:
> >
> > warning: no file matches F: scripts/clang-version.sh
> >
> > The CLANG/LLVM BUILD SUPPORT section in MAINTAINERS intends to track
> > changes in ./scripts/clang-version.sh; as the file is removed, track
> > changes in ./scripts/cc-version.sh instead now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
>
> Good catch, Lukas.
>
> As a tipp:
> Next time you can pass '--subject-prefix="PATCH next-YYYYMMDD"' when
> doing 'git format-patch ...' (or whatever you use to generate the
> patch).

I've never seen anyone use this prefix before.

What does the date really help? In staging, we apply everything on top
of staging-next and if it doesn't apply then we don't investigate, we
just say "doesn't apply. resend if needed".

We may as well just say [PATCH linux-next]. No one is ever going to
look up the date if it doesn't apply to the latest linux-next.

regards,
dan carpenter

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-22 13:37    [W:0.101 / U:3.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site