[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] compiler.h: Raise minimum version of GCC to 5.1 for arm64
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 at 23:09, Linus Torvalds
<> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 1:44 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> <> wrote:
> >
> > So, maybe the Sparc issue was just a similar but different bug in gcc
> > 4.9.x.
> Good catch. And I know this bug has happened independently on
> different architectures several times (I remember this on x86-64 as
> well), so I started looking around.
> And in fact, 4.9 was buggy on x86-64 too:
> And yeah, _that_ gcc bug wasn't actually x86-64 specific, but
> apparently a generic instruction scheduling bug.
> So it's an independent bug, but I do have to admit that the arguments
> against 4.9 are piling up (even if that particular fix apparently got
> fixed in the gcc branches and apparently backported to distro
> compilers too).

So if the arguments are piling up, what is holding us back, other than
inertia? RHEL 7 used to be a factor, but it ships with 4.8 not 4.9, so
its users already need to upgrade. Is anyone aware of a good reason to
keep 4.9 supported? Are any other long term supported distros using

I know that distros probably backported fixes for all of these issues,
but without a way to interrogate the compiler about this, that doesn't
really make a difference IMHO.

Note that banning 4.9 for arm64 and banning it in general should be
two different changes in any case, as the former will need to be
backported to -stable kernels as well.


 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-14 09:20    [W:0.092 / U:5.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site