lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] FPGA DFL Changes for 5.12
Tom,

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 07:46:29AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
> > On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> >> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
> >> changes for FPGA DFL.
> > Is there something I can do to help ?
> >
> > I am paid to look after linux-fpga, so i have plenty of time.
> >
> > Some ideas of what i am doing now privately i can do publicly.
> >
> > 1. keep linux-fpga sync-ed to greg's branch so linux-fpga is normally in a pullable state.

Is it not? It currently points to v5.11-rc1. If I start applying patches
that require the changes that went into Greg's branch I can merge.
> >
> > 2. an in-flight dev branch for the outstanding patches
>
> I have setup these branches based on Greg's char-misc-next
>
> fpga-next, which is char-misc-next base for fpga-testing
>
> fpga-testing, all the in-flight patches that would apply with automatic merge conflict resolution
>
> These are respectively
>
> https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-next
>
> https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-testing

Feel free to have your own repos/branches etc, but I'd like to keep the
offical trees on kernel.org.

Tbh I'd much rather see the patchwork instance be cleaned up if you want
to do stuff.
>
>
> There are two trivial changes, that could go to 5.12 now.
>
> fpga: dfl: fme: Constify static attribute_group structs
>
> fpga: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
>
> respectively
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210108235414.48017-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com/
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201228135135.28788-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com/

I was going to pick them up monday ...
>
>
> There are a couple of patchsets that conflict
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210105230855.15019-7-russell.h.weight@intel.com/
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201203171548.1538178-3-matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com/

Conflict between what and what?

> And the xilinx patchset
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201217075046.28553-1-sonals@xilinx.com/
>
> Which is being split/worked on offline.

I'm not sure what that means.
>
>
> If I have missed any patchset, poke me.
>
> Tom

- Moritz

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-10 18:09    [W:0.076 / U:1.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site