Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:50:52 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2 | From | Palmer Dabbelt <> |
| |
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:37:52 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch, > are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10? > > I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to > 5.11 then.
I'm OK taking it, but there's a few things I'd like to sort out. IIRC I put it on a temporary branch over here
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-remove_set_fs
under the assumption it might get lost otherwise, but let me know if that's not what you were looking for.
Arnd: Are you OK with the asm-generic stuff? I couldn't find anything in my mail history, so sorry if I just missed it.
Al: IIRC the plan here was to have me merge in a feature branch with this stuff, but it'd have to be based on your for-next as there are some dependencies over there. I see 5ae4998b5d6f ("powerpc: remove address space overrides using set_fs()") in vfs/for-next so I think we should be OK, but let me know if I'm doing something wrong.
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> now that we've sorted out a remaining issue base.set_fs should not >> be rebased any more, so you could pull it into the riscv tree or a topic >> branch. >> >> The first four patch should go into base.set_fs, though. Arnd, can you >> re-review the updated patches? > ---end quoted text---
|  |