[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: remove set_fs for riscv v2
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:37:52 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch,
> are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10?
> I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to
> 5.11 then.

I'm OK taking it, but there's a few things I'd like to sort out. IIRC I put it
on a temporary branch over here

under the assumption it might get lost otherwise, but let me know if that's not
what you were looking for.

Arnd: Are you OK with the asm-generic stuff? I couldn't find anything in my
mail history, so sorry if I just missed it.

Al: IIRC the plan here was to have me merge in a feature branch with this
stuff, but it'd have to be based on your for-next as there are some
dependencies over there. I see 5ae4998b5d6f ("powerpc: remove address space
overrides using set_fs()") in vfs/for-next so I think we should be OK, but let
me know if I'm doing something wrong.

> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> now that we've sorted out a remaining issue base.set_fs should not
>> be rebased any more, so you could pull it into the riscv tree or a topic
>> branch.
>> The first four patch should go into base.set_fs, though. Arnd, can you
>> re-review the updated patches?
> ---end quoted text---

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-26 19:51    [W:0.084 / U:1.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site