lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: dwc: improve msi handling
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:17:12 +0800
Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> wrote:

> CAUTION: Email originated externally, do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:53:45 +0100 Jon Hunter wrote:
>
>
> >
> > On 24/09/2020 12:05, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > Improve the msi code:
> > > 1. Add proper error handling.
> > > 2. Move dw_pcie_msi_init() from each users to designware host to solve
> > > msi page leakage in resume path.
> >
> > Apologies if this is slightly off topic, but I have been meaning to ask
> > about MSIs and PCI. On Tegra194 which uses the DWC PCI driver, whenever we
> > hotplug CPUs we see the following warnings ...
> >
> > [ 79.068351] WARNING KERN IRQ70: set affinity failed(-22).
> > [ 79.068362] WARNING KERN IRQ71: set affinity failed(-22).
> >
> > These interrupts are the MSIs ...
> >
> > 70: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 134217728 Edge PCIe PME, aerdrv
> > 71: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 134742016 Edge ahci[0001:01:00.0]
> >
> > This caused because ...
> >
> > static int dw_pci_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
> > const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> > {
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > Now the above is not unique to the DWC PCI host driver, it appears that
> > most PCIe drivers also do the same. However, I am curious if there is
> > any way to avoid the above warnings given that setting the affinity does
> > not appear to be supported in anyway AFAICT.
> >
>
>
> Could you please try below patch?
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index bf25d783b5c5..7e5dc54d060e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static struct irq_chip dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
> .name = "DWPCI-MSI",
> .irq_ack = dw_pci_bottom_ack,
> .irq_compose_msi_msg = dw_pci_setup_msi_msg,
> - .irq_set_affinity = dw_pci_msi_set_affinity,
> .irq_mask = dw_pci_bottom_mask,
> .irq_unmask = dw_pci_bottom_unmask,
> };

A complete patch w/o compiler warning:

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
index bf25d783b5c5..18f719cfed0b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
@@ -137,12 +137,6 @@ static void dw_pci_setup_msi_msg(struct irq_data *d, struct msi_msg *msg)
(int)d->hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo);
}

-static int dw_pci_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
- const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
-{
- return -EINVAL;
-}
-
static void dw_pci_bottom_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
@@ -197,7 +191,6 @@ static struct irq_chip dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
.name = "DWPCI-MSI",
.irq_ack = dw_pci_bottom_ack,
.irq_compose_msi_msg = dw_pci_setup_msi_msg,
- .irq_set_affinity = dw_pci_msi_set_affinity,
.irq_mask = dw_pci_bottom_mask,
.irq_unmask = dw_pci_bottom_unmask,
};
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-25 11:28    [W:0.077 / U:2.968 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site