[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/irq: Use printk_deferred() on raw_spin_lock() protected sections
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:22:12PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> While testing hotplug I got this BUG:

> It was caused by printk() inside a code section protected by a
> raw_spin_lock() that ended up calling a serial console that
> uses a regular spin_lock().
> Use the printk_deferred() to avoid calling the serial console
> in a raw_spin_lock() protected section.

I consider printk_deferred() to be a bug, can't we just wait for the new
printk implementation to land so we don't need all this nonsense?

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-24 12:28    [W:0.074 / U:10.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site