lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 0/2] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu performance dependencies
Date
Hi Rob, Rafael, Viresh, Daniel and Sudeep,

I am proposing the addition of performance dependencies in cpufreq core
and one if its drivers (the implementation/approach is RFC).
This is to support systems where exposed cpu performance controls are more
fine-grained that the platform's ability to scale cpus independently.

In this V2 posting of the proposed dt-binding to support this, I have
included an outline of how this information can be stored and passed onto
relevant OSPM frameworks.

Please see each patch for detailed information.

[v2]
* Fix errors when running make dt_binding_check
* Improve commit message description for the dt-binding
* Add RFC for implementation in cpufreq-core and one of its
drivers.

Nicola Mazzucato (2):
dt-bindings: arm: Add devicetree binding for
cpu-performance-dependencies
[RFC] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu-perf-dependencies

.../bindings/arm/cpu-perf-dependencies.yaml | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-perf-dependencies.yaml

--
2.27.0

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-24 11:53    [W:0.098 / U:31.936 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site