lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] dm: add support for passing through inline crypto support
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:21:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09 2020 at 7:44pm -0400,
> Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> >
> > Update the device-mapper core to support exposing the inline crypto
> > support of the underlying device(s) through the device-mapper device.
> >
> > This works by creating a "passthrough keyslot manager" for the dm
> > device, which declares support for encryption settings which all
> > underlying devices support. When a supported setting is used, the bio
> > cloning code handles cloning the crypto context to the bios for all the
> > underlying devices. When an unsupported setting is used, the blk-crypto
> > fallback is used as usual.
> >
> > Crypto support on each underlying device is ignored unless the
> > corresponding dm target opts into exposing it. This is needed because
> > for inline crypto to semantically operate on the original bio, the data
> > must not be transformed by the dm target. Thus, targets like dm-linear
> > can expose crypto support of the underlying device, but targets like
> > dm-crypt can't. (dm-crypt could use inline crypto itself, though.)
> >
> > When a key is evicted from the dm device, it is evicted from all
> > underlying devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
> > ---
> > block/blk-crypto.c | 1 +
> > block/keyslot-manager.c | 34 ++++++++++++
> > drivers/md/dm-core.h | 4 ++
> > drivers/md/dm-table.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/md/dm.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/device-mapper.h | 6 +++
> > include/linux/keyslot-manager.h | 7 +++
> > 7 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-crypto.c b/block/blk-crypto.c
> > index 2d5e60023b08..33555cf0e3e7 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-crypto.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-crypto.c
> > @@ -402,3 +402,4 @@ int blk_crypto_evict_key(struct request_queue *q,
> > */
> > return blk_crypto_fallback_evict_key(key);
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_crypto_evict_key);
> > diff --git a/block/keyslot-manager.c b/block/keyslot-manager.c
> > index 60ac406d54b9..e0f776c38d8a 100644
> > --- a/block/keyslot-manager.c
> > +++ b/block/keyslot-manager.c
> > @@ -416,6 +416,40 @@ void blk_ksm_unregister(struct request_queue *q)
> > {
> > q->ksm = NULL;
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_ksm_unregister);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * blk_ksm_intersect_modes() - restrict supported modes by child device
> > + * @parent: The keyslot manager for parent device
> > + * @child: The keyslot manager for child device, or NULL
> > + *
> > + * Clear any crypto mode support bits in @parent that aren't set in @child.
> > + * If @child is NULL, then all parent bits are cleared.
> > + *
> > + * Only use this when setting up the keyslot manager for a layered device,
> > + * before it's been exposed yet.
> > + */
> > +void blk_ksm_intersect_modes(struct blk_keyslot_manager *parent,
> > + const struct blk_keyslot_manager *child)
> > +{
> > + if (child) {
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + parent->max_dun_bytes_supported =
> > + min(parent->max_dun_bytes_supported,
> > + child->max_dun_bytes_supported);
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(child->crypto_modes_supported);
> > + i++) {
> > + parent->crypto_modes_supported[i] &=
> > + child->crypto_modes_supported[i];
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + parent->max_dun_bytes_supported = 0;
> > + memset(parent->crypto_modes_supported, 0,
> > + sizeof(parent->crypto_modes_supported));
> > + }
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_ksm_intersect_modes);
> >
> > /**
> > * blk_ksm_init_passthrough() - Init a passthrough keyslot manager
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-core.h b/drivers/md/dm-core.h
> > index c4ef1fceead6..4542050eebfc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-core.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > #include <linux/kthread.h>
> > #include <linux/ktime.h>
> > #include <linux/blk-mq.h>
> > +#include <linux/keyslot-manager.h>
> >
> > #include <trace/events/block.h>
> >
> > @@ -49,6 +50,9 @@ struct mapped_device {
> >
> > int numa_node_id;
> > struct request_queue *queue;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION
> > + struct blk_keyslot_manager ksm;
> > +#endif
> >
> > atomic_t holders;
> > atomic_t open_count;
>
> Any reason you placed the ksm member where you did?
>
> Looking at 'struct blk_keyslot_manager' I'm really hating adding that
> bloat to every DM device for a feature that really won't see much broad
> use (AFAIK).
>
> Any chance you could allocate 'struct blk_keyslot_manager' as needed so
> that most users of DM would only be carrying 1 extra pointer (set to
> NULL)?
I don't think there's any technical problem with doing that - the only
other thing that would need addressing is that the patch uses
"container_of" on that blk_keyslot_manager in dm_keyslot_evict() to get
a pointer to the struct mapped_device. I could try adding a "private"
field to struct blk_keyslot_manager and store a pointer to the struct
mapped_device there).
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-24 09:39    [W:0.197 / U:0.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site