lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 0/5] Add support for custom names for AT24 EEPROMs
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:50 AM Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> For platforms that have multiple boards and hence have multiple EEPROMs
> for identifying the different boards, it is useful to label the EEPROMs
> in device-tree so that they can be easily identified. For example, MAC
> address information is stored in the EEPROM on the processor module for
> some Jetson platforms which is not only required by the kernel but the
> bootloader as well. So having a simple way to identify the EEPROM is
> needed.
>
> Changes since V1:
> - By default initialise the nvmem_config.id as NVMEM_DEVID_AUTO and not
> NVMEM_DEVID_NONE
> - Dropped the 'maxItems' from the dt-binding doc.
>
> Jon Hunter (5):
> misc: eeprom: at24: Initialise AT24 NVMEM ID field
> dt-bindings: eeprom: at24: Add label property for AT24
> misc: eeprom: at24: Support custom device names for AT24 EEPROMs
> arm64: tegra: Add label properties for EEPROMs
> arm64: tegra: Populate EEPROMs for Jetson Xavier NX
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml | 3 +++
> .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p2771-0000.dts | 1 +
> .../arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p3310.dtsi | 1 +
> .../arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194-p2888.dtsi | 1 +
> .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194-p2972-0000.dts | 1 +
> .../nvidia/tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000.dts | 14 ++++++++++++
> .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194-p3668-0000.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++
> .../arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2180.dtsi | 1 +
> .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2371-2180.dts | 1 +
> .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p3450-0000.dts | 2 ++
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 11 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Just FYI: I'm fine with the at24 part. I can take them through my tree
for v5.10. Who is taking the DTS patches for tegra? Thierry? I can
provide you with an immutable branch if that's fine. I can't just ack
the at24 patches because they conflict with what I already have in my
tree for v5.10.

Bartosz

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-23 11:16    [W:0.350 / U:1.644 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site