lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v12 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel LGM SoC
From
Date
Hi Miquel,

Thank you for your review comments...

On 7/9/2020 9:20 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Murugan,
>
> A few more comments below, but I guess the driver looks better now.
>
>> +struct ebu_nand_controller {
>> + struct nand_controller controller;
>> + struct nand_chip chip;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + void __iomem *ebu;
>> + void __iomem *hsnand;
>> + struct dma_chan *dma_tx;
>> + struct dma_chan *dma_rx;
>> + struct completion dma_access_complete;
>> + unsigned long clk_rate;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> + u32 nd_para0;
>> + u8 cs_num;
>> + struct ebu_nand_cs cs[MAX_CS];
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline struct ebu_nand_controller *nand_to_ebu(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> + return container_of(chip, struct ebu_nand_controller, chip);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u8 ebu_nand_readb(struct nand_chip *chip)
>
> Can't you prefix with intel_ instead of ebu_ ?
>
>> +{
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> + void __iomem *nand_wait = ebu_host->ebu + EBU_WAIT;
>> + u8 cs_num = ebu_host->cs_num;
>> + u32 stat;
>> + int ret;
>> + u8 val;
>> +
>> + val = readb(ebu_host->cs[cs_num].chipaddr + HSNAND_CS_OFFS);
>> +
>> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(nand_wait, stat, stat & EBU_WAIT_WR_C,
>> + 20, 1000);
>
> If you do this operation each time a byte is read/written, you probable
> want to shrink the polling delay a little bit, to 1 or even 0.
Ok, Noted.
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(ebu_host->dev,
>> + "ebu nand write timeout. nand_wait(0x%p)=0x%x\n",
>> + nand_wait, readl(nand_wait));
>> +
>> + return val;
>
> You should not return val if ret is !0 I guess
Yes, You're correct.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ebu_nand_writeb(struct nand_chip *chip, u32 offset, u8 value)
>> +{
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> + void __iomem *nand_wait = ebu_host->ebu + EBU_WAIT;
>> + u8 cs_num = ebu_host->cs_num;
>> + u32 stat;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + writeb(value, ebu_host->cs[cs_num].chipaddr + offset);
>> +
>> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(nand_wait, stat, stat & EBU_WAIT_WR_C,
>> + 20, 1000);
>
> Here as well
Noted.
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(ebu_host->dev,
>> + "ebu nand write timeout. nand_wait(0x%p)=0x%x\n",
>> + nand_wait, readl(nand_wait));
>
> If this can fail, then the helper should return an error and be treated.
Noted, will update.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ebu_read_buf(struct nand_chip *chip, u_char *buf, unsigned int len)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>> + buf[i] = ebu_nand_readb(chip);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ebu_write_buf(struct nand_chip *chip, const u_char *buf, int len)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>> + ebu_nand_writeb(chip, HSNAND_CS_OFFS, buf[i]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ebu_nand_disable(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> +
>> + writel(0, ebu_host->ebu + EBU_CON);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ebu_select_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> + void __iomem *nand_con = ebu_host->ebu + EBU_CON;
>> + u32 cs = ebu_host->cs_num;
>> +
>> + writel(EBU_CON_NANDM_EN | EBU_CON_CSMUX_E_EN | EBU_CON_CS_P_LOW |
>> + EBU_CON_SE_P_LOW | EBU_CON_WP_P_LOW | EBU_CON_PRE_P_LOW |
>> + EBU_CON_IN_CS_S(cs) | EBU_CON_OUT_CS_S(cs) |
>> + EBU_CON_LAT_EN_CS_P, nand_con);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ebu_nand_setup_timing(struct ebu_nand_controller *ctrl,
>> + const struct nand_sdr_timings *timings)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int rate = clk_get_rate(ctrl->clk) / 1000000;
>> + unsigned int period = DIV_ROUND_UP(1000000, rate);
>> + u32 trecov, thold, twrwait, trdwait;
>> + u32 reg = 0;
>> +
>> + trecov = DIV_ROUND_UP(max(timings->tREA_max, timings->tREH_min),
>> + period);
>> + reg |= EBU_BUSCON_RECOVC(trecov);
>> +
>> + thold = DIV_ROUND_UP(max(timings->tDH_min, timings->tDS_min), period);
>> + reg |= EBU_BUSCON_HOLDC(thold);
>> +
>> + trdwait = DIV_ROUND_UP(max(timings->tRC_min, timings->tREH_min),
>> + period);
>> + reg |= EBU_BUSCON_WAITRDC(trdwait);
>> +
>> + twrwait = DIV_ROUND_UP(max(timings->tWC_min, timings->tWH_min), period);
>> + reg |= EBU_BUSCON_WAITWRC(twrwait);
>> +
>> + reg |= EBU_BUSCON_CMULT_V4 | EBU_BUSCON_BCGEN_CS | EBU_BUSCON_ALEC |
>> + EBU_BUSCON_SETUP_EN;
>> +
>> + writel(reg, ctrl->ebu + EBU_BUSCON(ctrl->cs_num));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ebu_nand_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int csline,
>> + const struct nand_data_interface *conf)
>
> I recently changed the naming around the data interface, please
> have a look at the recent commits and update the namings here as
> well.
Sure, will go through update accordingly.
>
>> +{
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ctrl = nand_to_ebu(chip);
>> + const struct nand_sdr_timings *timings;
>> +
>> + timings = nand_get_sdr_timings(conf);
>> + if (IS_ERR(timings))
>> + return PTR_ERR(timings);
>> +
>> + if (csline == NAND_DATA_IFACE_CHECK_ONLY)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + ebu_nand_setup_timing(ctrl, timings);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ebu_nand_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
>> + struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
>> +{
>> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>> +
>> + if (section)
>> + return -ERANGE;
>> +
>> + oobregion->offset = HSNAND_ECC_OFFSET;
>> + oobregion->length = chip->ecc.total;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ebu_nand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
>> + struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
>> +{
>> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>> +
>> + if (section)
>> + return -ERANGE;
>> +
>> + oobregion->offset = chip->ecc.total + HSNAND_ECC_OFFSET;
>> + oobregion->length = mtd->oobsize - oobregion->offset;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops ebu_nand_ooblayout_ops = {
>> + .ecc = ebu_nand_ooblayout_ecc,
>> + .free = ebu_nand_ooblayout_free,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void ebu_dma_rx_callback(void *cookie)
>> +{
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host = cookie;
>> +
>> + dmaengine_terminate_async(ebu_host->dma_rx);
>> +
>> + complete(&ebu_host->dma_access_complete);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ebu_dma_tx_callback(void *cookie)
>> +{
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host = cookie;
>> +
>> + dmaengine_terminate_async(ebu_host->dma_tx);
>> +
>> + complete(&ebu_host->dma_access_complete);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ebu_dma_start(struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host, u32 dir,
>> + const u8 *buf, u32 len)
>> +{
>> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx;
>> + struct completion *dma_completion;
>> + dma_async_tx_callback callback;
>> + struct dma_chan *chan;
>> + dma_cookie_t cookie;
>> + unsigned long flags = DMA_CTRL_ACK | DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT;
>> + dma_addr_t buf_dma;
>> + int ret;
>> + u32 timeout;
>> +
>> + if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
>> + chan = ebu_host->dma_rx;
>> + dma_completion = &ebu_host->dma_access_complete;
>> + callback = ebu_dma_rx_callback;
>> + } else {
>> + chan = ebu_host->dma_tx;
>> + dma_completion = &ebu_host->dma_access_complete;
>> + callback = ebu_dma_tx_callback;
>> + }
>> +
>> + buf_dma = dma_map_single(chan->device->dev, (void *)buf, len, dir);
>> + if (dma_mapping_error(chan->device->dev, buf_dma)) {
>> + dev_err(ebu_host->dev, "Failed to map DMA buffer\n");
>> + ret = -EIO;
>> + goto err_unmap;
>> + }
>> +
>> + tx = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(chan, buf_dma, len, dir, flags);
>> + if (!tx)
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> + tx->callback = callback;
>> + tx->callback_param = ebu_host;
>> + cookie = tx->tx_submit(tx);
>> +
>> + ret = dma_submit_error(cookie);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(ebu_host->dev, "dma_submit_error %d\n", cookie);
>> + ret = -EIO;
>> + goto err_unmap;
>> + }
>> +
>> + init_completion(dma_completion);
>> + dma_async_issue_pending(chan);
>> +
>> + /* Wait DMA to finish the data transfer.*/
>> + timeout =
>
> Don't break the line here
Okay, Noted.
>
>> + wait_for_completion_timeout(dma_completion, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
>> + if (!timeout) {
>> + dev_err(ebu_host->dev, "I/O Error in DMA RX (status %d)\n",
>> + dmaengine_tx_status(chan, cookie, NULL));
>> + dmaengine_terminate_sync(chan);
>> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + goto err_unmap;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_unmap:
>> + dma_unmap_single(ebu_host->dev, buf_dma, len, dir);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ebu_nand_trigger(struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host,
>> + int page, u32 cmd)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int val;
>> +
>> + val = cmd | (page & 0xFF) << HSNAND_CTL1_ADDR_SHIFT;
>> + writel(val, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CTL1);
>> + val = (page & 0xFFFF00) >> 8 | HSNAND_CTL2_CYC_N_V5;
>> + writel(val, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CTL2);
>> +
>> + writel(ebu_host->nd_para0, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_PARA0);
>> +
>> + /* clear first, will update later */
>> + writel(0xFFFFFFFF, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CMSG_0);
>> + writel(0xFFFFFFFF, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CMSG_1);
>> +
>> + writel(HSNAND_INT_MSK_CTL_WR_C,
>> + ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_INT_MSK_CTL);
>> +
>> + val = cmd == NAND_CMD_READ0 ? HSNAND_CTL_RW_READ : HSNAND_CTL_RW_WRITE;
>
> I don't like this, prefer having a "read/write" boolean as a parameter.
Noted, will update.
>
>> +
>> + writel(HSNAND_CTL_MSG_EN | HSNAND_CTL_CKFF_EN |
>> + HSNAND_CTL_ECC_OFF_V8TH | HSNAND_CTL_CE_SEL_CS(ebu_host->cs_num) |
>> + HSNAND_CTL_ENABLE_ECC | HSNAND_CTL_GO | val,
>> + ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CTL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ebu_nand_read_page_hwecc(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf,
>> + int oob_required, int page)
>> +{
>> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> + int ret, x;
>> +
>> + ebu_nand_trigger(ebu_host, page, NAND_CMD_READ0);
>> +
>> + ret = ebu_dma_start(ebu_host, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM, buf, mtd->writesize);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (oob_required)
>> + chip->ecc.read_oob(chip, page);
>> +
>> + x = readl(ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CTL);
>> + x &= ~HSNAND_CTL_GO;
>> + writel(x, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CTL);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ebu_nand_write_page_hwecc(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *buf,
>> + int oob_required, int page)
>> +{
>> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> + void __iomem *int_sta = ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_INT_STA;
>> + int ret, val, x;
>> + u32 reg;
>> +
>> + ebu_nand_trigger(ebu_host, page, NAND_CMD_SEQIN);
>> +
>> + ret = ebu_dma_start(ebu_host, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV, buf, mtd->writesize);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (oob_required) {
>> + reg = (chip->oob_poi[3] << 24) | (chip->oob_poi[2] << 16) |
>> + (chip->oob_poi[1] << 8) | chip->oob_poi[0];
>> +
>> + writel(reg, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CMSG_0);
>> +
>> + reg = (chip->oob_poi[7] << 24) | (chip->oob_poi[6] << 16) |
>> + (chip->oob_poi[5] << 8) | chip->oob_poi[4];
>> +
>> + writel(reg, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CMSG_1);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(int_sta, val,
>> + !(val & HSNAND_INT_STA_WR_C), 10, 1000);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return -EIO;
>
> return ret ?
Yes, ret will come.
>
>> +
>> + x = readl(ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CTL);
>> + x &= ~HSNAND_CTL_GO;
>> + writel(x, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CTL);
>
> What is this? Looks like it deserves a helper with a nice name.
Register High Speed NAND control, it is exceeding the 80 characters to
avoid that, short it, will update.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const u8 ecc_strength[] = { 1, 1, 4, 8, 24, 32, 40, 60, };
>
> ^ is this normal?
>
>> +
>> +static int ebu_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> + u32 ecc_steps, ecc_bytes, ecc_total, pagesize, pg_per_blk;
>> + u32 ecc_strength_ds = chip->ecc.strength;
>> + u32 ecc_size = chip->ecc.size;
>> + u32 writesize = mtd->writesize;
>> + u32 blocksize = mtd->erasesize;
>> + int bch_algo, start, val;
>> +
>> + if (chip->ecc.mode != NAND_ECC_HW)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* Default to an ECC size of 512 */
>> + if (!chip->ecc.size)
>> + chip->ecc.size = 512;
>> +
>> + switch (ecc_size) {
>> + case 512:
>> + start = 1;
>> + if (!ecc_strength_ds)
>> + ecc_strength_ds = 4;
>> + break;
>> + case 1024:
>> + start = 4;
>> + if (!ecc_strength_ds)
>> + ecc_strength_ds = 32;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* BCH ECC algorithm Settings for number of bits per 512B/1024B */
>> + bch_algo = round_up(start + 1, 4);
>> + for (val = start; val < bch_algo; val++) {
>> + if (ecc_strength_ds == ecc_strength[val])
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + if (val == bch_algo)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (ecc_strength_ds == 8)
>> + ecc_bytes = 14;
>> + else
>> + ecc_bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(ecc_strength_ds * fls(8 * ecc_size), 8);
>> +
>> + ecc_steps = writesize / ecc_size;
>> + ecc_total = ecc_steps * ecc_bytes;
>> + if ((ecc_total + 8) > mtd->oobsize)
>> + return -ERANGE;
>> +
>> + chip->ecc.total = ecc_total;
>> + pagesize = fls(writesize >> 11);
>> + if (pagesize > HSNAND_PARA0_PAGE_V8192)
>> + return -ERANGE;
>> +
>> + pg_per_blk = fls((blocksize / writesize) >> 6) << 4;
>
> If << 4 is here to mean / 8, then I don't want a shift operation
> because it is highly unreadable and compilers know how to optimize
> this.
Thanks!, will update.
>
>> + if (pg_per_blk > HSNAND_PARA0_PIB_V256)
>> + return -ERANGE;
>> +
>> + ebu_host->nd_para0 = pagesize | pg_per_blk | HSNAND_PARA0_BYP_EN_NP |
>> + HSNAND_PARA0_BYP_DEC_NP | HSNAND_PARA0_ADEP_EN |
>> + HSNAND_PARA0_TYPE_ONFI | (val << 29);
>> +
>> + mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &ebu_nand_ooblayout_ops);
>> + chip->ecc.read_page = ebu_nand_read_page_hwecc;
>> + chip->ecc.write_page = ebu_nand_write_page_hwecc;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ebu_nand_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
>> + const struct nand_operation *op, bool check_only)
>> +{
>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ctrl = nand_to_ebu(chip);
>> + const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
>> + unsigned int op_id;
>> + int i, time_out, ret = 0;
>> + u32 stat;
>> +
>> + if (check_only)
>> + ebu_select_chip(chip);
>
> What is the point of selecting the chip if check_only is true?
while converting to exec_op() based data structure, added like other
drivers, let me check and update accordingly, Thanks!.

Regards
Vadivel
>
>> +
>> + for (op_id = 0; op_id < op->ninstrs; op_id++) {
>> + instr = &op->instrs[op_id];
>> +
>> + switch (instr->type) {
>> + case NAND_OP_CMD_INSTR:
>> + ebu_nand_writeb(chip, HSNAND_CLE_OFFS | HSNAND_CS_OFFS,
>> + instr->ctx.cmd.opcode);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case NAND_OP_ADDR_INSTR:
>> + for (i = 0; i < instr->ctx.addr.naddrs; i++)
>> + ebu_nand_writeb(chip,
>> + HSNAND_ALE_OFFS | HSNAND_CS_OFFS,
>> + instr->ctx.addr.addrs[i]);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case NAND_OP_DATA_IN_INSTR:
>> + ebu_read_buf(chip, instr->ctx.data.buf.in,
>> + instr->ctx.data.len);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR:
>> + ebu_write_buf(chip, instr->ctx.data.buf.out,
>> + instr->ctx.data.len);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR:
>> + time_out = instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms * 1000;
>> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctrl->ebu + EBU_WAIT,
>> + stat, stat & EBU_WAIT_RDBY,
>> + 20, time_out);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-11 08:49    [W:0.110 / U:0.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site