lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v7 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: intel: Add Keem Bay eMMC PHY bindings
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 5:10 PM
> To: Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie
> <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>
> Cc: kishon@ti.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; Shevchenko, Andriy
> <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>; eswara.kota@linux.intel.com;
> vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com; Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi
> Bai <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com>; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: intel: Add Keem Bay eMMC
> PHY bindings
>
> On 21-08-20, 19:37, Wan Ahmad Zainie wrote:
> > Binding description for Intel Keem Bay eMMC PHY.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wan Ahmad Zainie
> > <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml | 44
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-
> phy.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-
> phy.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..4cbbd3887c13
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-
> phy.yam
> > +++ l
> > @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-
> phy.yaml#"
> > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
> > +
> > +title: Intel Keem Bay eMMC PHY bindings
>
> This seems same as
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-emmc-phy.yaml, why
> not add a new compatible in lgm binding, or did I miss a difference?

AFAIK, LGM make use of syscon node, whilst KMB does not.
And LGM and KMB belongs to different SoC family. So, I prefer them to
be in separate file.

Having said that, with few changes in wordings in title and description,
I think we can make it generic and can be used across few products.

>
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Wan Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: intel,keembay-emmc-phy
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + clocks:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + clock-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: emmcclk
> > +
> > + "#phy-cells":
> > + const: 0
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - "#phy-cells"
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + phy@20290000 {
> > + compatible = "intel,keembay-emmc-phy";
> > + reg = <0x20290000 0x54>;
> > + clocks = <&emmc>;
> > + clock-names = "emmcclk";
> > + #phy-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>
> --
> ~Vinod

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-01 07:00    [W:0.077 / U:2.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site